I found the article depicting various markets “regulating
themselves” to be very eye-opening to the fact that “morality isn’t built into
markets.” It is very true, and here are some examples from this article that relate to this.
As it starts out, 85 people - the top 0.00000001% - own as much as the
poorest 3.5 BILLION people. That’s astonishing! Then on top of that, to note
that these high levels of inequality corrode the democratic process because
these people use their wealth to influence the political process to create laws
and regulations that benefit them, the rich over everyone else, those who are
not in the top 0.00000001%
and especially not the poorest. For
example, when running for president, or any government elected official position,
one must campaign to be elected. However, those campaigns are expensive. Thus,
those who support these campaigns financially essentially just bought themselves
influence in the government through that campaigning and potentially elected
official. This is something that it seems most people who vote and have a
partial awareness around of the government and how it works, seems aware of,
but don’t know what to do about it, or can’t do anything about it. This problem
then gets brushed under the rug, because those who pay for it gain them
influence, or else the system must be changed.
Another incident that most of the American population became
aware of is the Bangladesh garment factory collapse. The majority of Americans
are aware that goods sold in the United States, are often not produced or
manufactured here, thus the low prices. However when this incident happened, it
was all over the news, creating awareness in American citizens of the
conditions that these workers are in. When it’s not our workers (American
citizens) who are in danger, how apt are American consumers going to change the
conditions in which goods are produced and manufactured?
Today’s society also seems to have an abundance of waste
type disasters, such as oil spills, radiation exposure and toxic waste. All of
these have extremely harsh impacts on the environment, something humans seem
incapable of truly preserving. Oil spills destroy oceanic life in an unnatural way
and are spread across the globe due to currents. Not only do these have major
impacts on the environment and humans, but also costs an astronomical amount of
money to “contain” or fix. In addition, although there are regulations that
revolve around these types of disasters, not all of them are full proof as
shown in this article. The containment of radiation is sometime not enough, or
as well done as it should be. The link below shows an innovative way in which
nuclear waste could be stored. It makes one think, why aren’t more innovations
such as this being implemented to solve these various market place and
regulation problems?
Overall, this article well depicted the lack of knowledge
that the general public has about various markets and regulations. Not only
does it inform the reader via text, but the images add a very compelling
component to addressing this problem.
http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/making-nuclear-power-safer/handling-nuclear-waste/infographic-dry-cask-cooling-pool-nuclear-waste.html#share
Nice post! The last part of your blog reminded me of something Edward Woodhouse said in the reading. He said something along the lines of a patient is ill equipped to decide which antibiotic is the best for his or her treatment, and then Woodhouse related it to how consumers more often than not make bad decisions when purchasing products. One example he used was cotton. Cotton is extremely popular and worn a lot even though growing the crop has detrimental effects the environment. So the problem them becomes how can consumers be educated about the numerous implications of buying products. So that products can be guided by the market towards being better for the environment and causing less social injustice. The article you mentioned is defiantly a great start.
ReplyDelete